UNC calls for full criminal forensic investigation into Tobago oil spill

Home*Cover Story*News

UNC calls for full criminal forensic investigation into Tobago oil spill

Opposition MP for Oropouche East, Dr Roodal Moonilal, is calling for a forensic examination into the Tobago oil spill and owners of the capsized barge.

Moonilal speaking at UNC’s weekly media briefing, described the February 7th spill as an “act of environmental terrorism” and said the country was no closer to understanding how and who caused the spill than when it was first identified.

“We have had this matter which constitutes a regional security issue and today an environmental disaster,” he said as he began addressing the matter at his party’s headquarters at Mulchan Seuchan Rd, Chaguanas.

He noted the oil spill’s effects had gone beyond the coastline of Tobago and was now affecting other islands such as Grenada, Bonaire and Aruba.

Moonilal said the public had to rely on media reports which traced the origins of the barge and related matters and chain of activities that led to the oil spill.

“If the newspaper and investigative journalists across the transatlantic ocean can do this, what is the Government doing? How come the Government of TT – with all the multilateral support at their disposal… Mr (Fitzgerald) Hinds runs the Ministry of National Security where we have spent billions on intelligence and so on, and the Government cannot respond today to tell us who are owners of that vessel called the Gulfstream barge.

“They cannot tell us, conclusively, where did it originate from? Where was it going? What was it doing?”

On February 17, the Prime Minister said while good progress was made and many leads identified, there was no definitive identification of the vessel’s operators or owners and confirmation of the offending parties.

A recent report said a Panamanian firm was at the centre of the spill.

Moonilal said TT was in a fascinating position where its agencies and waters might have been used to facilitate sanctions-busting (the act of trading with a country with which trade is not officially allowed).

Moonilal said the Government had not produced a report as to the owners of the vessel and what steps were being taken to call those responsible to account and to pay for the damage incurred.

He repeated the damage was long-term as the country was dealing with fisheries, livelihoods, jobs and environment.

“This Government has not been able – in 21 days or so – to bring any conclusion in terms of investigation….”

He said while the Ministry of National Security had spoken to an ongoing investigation into the matter, he said the country was no nearer to having questions answered.

UNC called for a full criminal forensic investigation to trace the “digital footprints of this environmental act of terrorism and sanctions-busting,” Moonilal said.

He added that the account should be multi-divisional, multi-agency and cross-border to ensure questions were answered.

“This is a serious threat to tourism in the Caribbean; the life-blood of Caribbean economies, generally, is tourism. And when certain islands are affected this way, there are long-term problems.”

“But the Government needs to tell us first what they are doing and if they have arrived at any preliminary conclusions based on the enormous resources at their disposal.”

Moonilal said there were environmental laws and marine legislation that could be looked at for pollution, recklessness, negligence, destruction of the environment to hold individuals and entities accountable.

“Just the act of abandoning a barge in the sea may constitute some offences as well.

“So you have to find people and companies to call to book and a forensic investigation into that led by a Ministry of National Security that is awake, a minister that is awake, with a multi-divisional team – a very small team of about four-five people – working with the international agencies.

“The US has agencies that deal with this, Europe has agencies that deal with this, you would think a preliminary conclusion on this could come in seven days.”

Moonilal said, about 25 days after the spill, there was not a preliminary conclusion from the Government about who caused it.